I'm sure you must have heard some of the criticisms of today's higher education: that students are sheltered little snowflakes who insist on being overprotected by trigger warnings and safe spaces; that they're "woke " and intolerant of views that challenge their own unchallenged assumptions; that their "left-wing" professors are indoctrinating them with propaganda; and that colleges and universities themselves are stifling any ideas that aren't "politically correct".
Christopher L. Eisgruber, President and formerly Provost of Princeton University, begs to disagree. He's not claiming that academia is perfect. He's aware of instances of what he calls mob censorship as in crowds disrupting speeches by people they disagree with. But in Terms of Respect: How Colleges Get Free Speech Right he asserts that in reality institutions of higher education and their students are part of, rather than different from, the rest of America, a nation confronting a serious civic crisis.
"We divide into distinct, cohesive political groups that not only disagree with but also dislike and distrust one another. We also increasingly communicate through media that privilege provocation and extremity over deliberation and comity. As a result, America's civic discourse has become ruder and more partisan than in the recent past, and we are risk of losing our ability to talk through our differences."
Drawing on both extensive background research and candid narratives of his and his colleagues experiences of campus controversies, Eisgruber weighs in on topics such as:
*the complex and situational nature of free speech and its potential compatibility with diversity and inclusion;
*the importance of civility rules and professional standards,
*the ways in which what is considered acceptable speech has evolved over time;
*the dangers created by political polarization and social media,
*and how free speech can easily be weaponized.
A unifying message throughout the book is that many concepts are way more complicated than we think and that our conceptualizations may contain implicit bias. There are a few points that I had a little trouble grasping. But the value of the book as a whole made the extra effort feel worthwhile.
Although he offers no silver bullets to solve the crises and misunderstandings, Eisgruber offers recommendations on how institutions of higher education can better handle the current landscape. Although he doesn't sugarcoat the obstacles standing in the way of transcending today's hostility and intolerance or pretend that it will happen easily or quickly he confirms throughout the book that it is possible and necessary.
"We must accept our responsibility to achieve free speech and equality together, for all Americans, now. We must demonstrate unstinting fidelity to both values if we are to vindicate our constitutional ideals and escape the civic crisis manifest on our campuses and in our polity."
I highly recommend Terms of Respect for higher education professionals. I also recommend it for anyone who is concerned about the current state of affairs on and off campuses.
On a purrrsonal note, this review has what I think is an interesting back story. I was tracking a higher education relevant book I wanted to review as a Christmas ð gift for the UMaine higher education professors. When I started getting short on time and that book still wasn't in a Minerva library I sought an alternative book. I requested Terms of Respect when it was being processed in one library.
A great big shout out goes out to Elizabeth Allan, Leah Hakola, and Kathleen Gillon who not only bring discussions of controversial topics into the classroom but model professionalism and commitments to free speech and equality. Their course of studies beautifully prepares grad students for the challenges of student services work in such contentious times. Truly they are a credit to Maine's flagship university.
Jules Hathaway
Sent from my U.S.Cellular© Smartphone